+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 51 to 59 of 59

Thread: The beginning of "time" thread (with and without nerdz)

  1. #51
    Deputy Dawg Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen. Dolemite has a gigantic e-peen.
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga
    Posts
    15,134
    Quote Originally Posted by RayDog View Post
    It is knowable. It is the science fiction masquerading as science that makes physics appear far more complicated than it is.
    Can it be knowable to entities living in 2D shadowland to know that they are simply a projection coming from a 3D reality?

    A simple yes or no would be ideal.

  • #52
    asshat RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club RayDog Shaggy Bronze Club
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,086
    Quote Originally Posted by Dolemite View Post
    Can it be knowable to entities living in 2D shadowland to know that they are simply a projection coming from a 3D reality?

    A simple yes or no would be ideal.
    Your question has no basis in reality and is therefore irrelevant.

  • #53
    bunghole BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer is probably pretty witty. or good at photoshop. or porn. BerlinerBaer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    752
    Quote Originally Posted by Bolverk View Post
    Correct. That which can be observed and replicated comprises the foundation of scientific "theory". Until that occurs, an idea remains in the realm of "hypothesis". With super-strong telescopes and other instruments measuring background radiation and whatnot, we can see very far back in "time" at the early universe, but we will never be able to see before the observable (the Big Bang).
    Fixed this oft-quoted misconception

    Quote Originally Posted by RayDog View Post
    We do not know how a net amount of matter versus antimatter is produced. We do know that it is produced, which is a start. We can also recognize that matter is produced within stars such as our sun, as the sun will increase its volume more than a thousand times and it is physically impossible for that to occur without mass/matter being added.
    The Ideal Gas Law handles this adequately enough. I'm not sure why a new hypothesis is needed.

    The sun's core will heat up as it runs through its hydrogen, then helium fuel more quickly. It's mass and therefore its gravity will not change. The increase in temperature will lead to an expansion of volume.

  • #54
    asshat HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,491
    B
    Quote Originally Posted by zepol87 View Post
    I offer no value to this discussion but I am interested in the theories hypotheses.
    Fify.

    This really becomes more of a philosophical discussion than a purely scientific topic as there is no way to test any hypothesis such as M-theory or string theory. Personally, I find string theory to be most fascinating and incredibly profound. An idea that I've had about why some of the strings would be closed anynd others would be open is that all strings are closed, however we would only be able to see (detect) the vibrations they resonate through our three dimensional spacetime. In actuality, they would likely close and form their loop in a higher spatial dimension above our own.
    Last edited by HOOK'EMHOOAH; 01-10-2017 at 05:22 AM.

  • #55
    asshat HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,491
    Quote Originally Posted by RayDog View Post
    Your question has no basis in reality and is therefore irrelevant.
    I woudnt say it has no basis in reality. A shadow is a 2D slice of a 3D object projected upon it. With this knowledge, we can conceivably identify any object if we can capture enough images of the projected 2D slices. To carry this further, an object with 4 spatial dimensions would project 3D shadows upon our 3D plane. As the 4D object moves along any axis through its higher dimensions, we would observe the shadow slices changing. I'm pretty sure this is part of the holographic conjecture hypothesis.

  • #56
    Here is a basic overview of the cosmological argument of Leibniz:


  • #57
    asshat neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44 Probably Shaggy upper class neonmoon44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pig Farm
    Posts
    20,461
    Anyone else get the feeling like we are on step 3 of human evolution out of like a 1000 steps? And also feel a little pissed off we will not be part of the telekinesis steps, etc?

    1. Don't $#@! outside
    2. Invent computers


    556. Telekinesis

    1000. Pure energy

  • #58
    asshat Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police might be a clever chap. or know the right people. know what i mean, nudge nudge? Grammer Police's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    UCO Lick
    Posts
    8,380
    I get the feeling that our existence will change very rapidly and in some ways catastrophically.

    Telekinesis and stuff like that which today seem like complete science fiction, won't seem that way even 10 years from now. In 2027 we won't call it telekinesis, but in many ways whatever we call it will, to a 2017 observer, be indistinguishable from telekinesis.

  • #59
    asshat HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH Shaggy Bronze Club HOOK'EMHOOAH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,491
    Neonmoon, I think I'm pickin' up what you're layin' down. I don't think each "step" would happen one at a time, but would instead be groups and some "steps" may be higher up than others along the way.

    With research currently underway, mapping the human brain with electrodes and the eventual advent of a device to detect and interpret signals directly from the brain will facilitate exactly what Grammer is talking about, at least in my estimation.

  • + Reply to Thread
    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts

     

     

    Home .. Advertise .. ShaggyShop .. PanchoChat
    Football .. OC .. Basketball .. Baseball .. Other Sports .. RC Didn't Offer .. Gamboool
    Varsity .. Hole in the Wall .. PCL .. Einstein's .. Nasty's .. GM Steakhouse .. NSAA .. Classics
    Bada Bing .. Bernard .. Nerdz .. Can you help me with this? .. Shagslist .. Cloak Room .. Bellmont